Monday, 31 May 2010

Warning: may contain Politics

The sight of Danny Alexander and his defenders pointing to the fact that he hasn't, technically, done anything illegal seems to make a mockery of the core liberal value (as I understand it):

A healthy society is one with less, and not more, explicit legislation, because people can be trusted to do the right thing and not just the legal thing.

The three year exemption from CGT which Danny Alexander took advantage of was intended to avoid paralysing the housing market by wrongly taxing, as second-home-owners, people who found themselves caught in a sluggish housing market. Without it, there was the danger that buyer-sellers would have been completely unable to commit to a new home until they'd sold their old home, resulting in a total freeze of sales.

We could, of course, have doubled the detail of the legislation to specify many included and excluded situations, which would seemingly have excluded Danny Alexander from exemption, but isn't that exactly the kind of over-interfering legislation that Lib Dems are against?

I can just about forgive the average citizen for failing to make the connection between their taxes and the schools and hospitals they pay for. But MPs? Surely our MPs should be beyond reproach when it comes to tax avoidance. When the expenses scandal broke, the main defence was that 'everybody was doing it'. Except the Lib Dems of course, who won many people's votes (we have friends among them) on the grounds that they were not implicated in the great MP benefit fraud.

When Nick Clegg used his public platform to hammer home the 'fact' that his MPs had not taken advantage of the second-homes system, was he deliberately missing a key sentence: " ... as far as I know, but we haven't really bothered to look into it." ?

Even if we don't feel directly conned, it's all starting to look a little ridiculous.

How a chief secretary can convincingly implement a tightening of the loop holes he just used to his own advantage is beyond me. How a government can come down harshly on the tiny fraction of people who play the system for tiny sums of money which they may not be entitled to, while turning a blind eye to the blatant fraud carried out by their own colleagues, is also beyond me.

Integrity is, in my mind, defined by how we behave in the loop holes.

David Laws, 'a man of great integrity', appeals to us on the grounds of a pathological desire for privacy combined with an uncharacteristic attack of confusion: apparently he didn't understand that the definition of partner applied in his circumstances

I don't believe that claiming that you couldn't quite make sense of the commons rules about partnership, when you're simultaneously asking us to trust you to take a financial scalpel to society, is coherent. Either you're a very bright and clever person who can make sense of very complicated things, or you're not. If you got that wrong, and you really thought you'd got it right, how can you be so confident that axing the Future Jobs Fund is the right thing to do? How can you be confident that a brake on public spending isn't going to tip us into another recession? You didn't even realise that the lover you've lived with for a decade was your partner!

He cited the lack of joint bank accounts and separate social lives as the reasons why they weren't partners. Fantastic - hundreds of thousands of unmarried couples around the country can presumably start declaring themselves single parent families for the calculation of their family tax credit, because they don't have a joint account and she never goes with him to darts on a Thursday night?

Or... was he suggesting that there are different rules for gay people?

The burden of internalised homophobia is no doubt heavy for David Laws, but I don't really want my leaders dragging that kind of luggage around with them. Ignoring the possible influence it might have on their actual decision making, and the message it sends about his willingness to demand a society in which everybody is free to be themselves, it's a headfuck.

I don't want my leaders keeping huge personal secrets. The drain emotional and psychological energy. And if they don't then the keeper is barely human, and just as unsuitable for public office.

Apparently Alexander will be protected because it's just too embarrassing to go through 2 chief secretaries in a weekend. And Laws will be back, because greed and fraud and deception are forgivable in bright posh people, just not the estate-dwelling scum who play the system so that their kids don't miss out on school trips.

A final thought: I do not believe that David Cameron didn't know about David Laws. On the day he became PM, his security advisers will have asked him if he'd like to share the names of the people he's intending to appoint. If certain names came up, the advisers will have invited him to read a pertinent excerpt from the individual's file. I just can't believe that the fact that Laws is a closeted gay man didn't come up. If they couldn't put that together with his expenses record to make 4 then we should all be worried about what other skeletons are rattling in our cabinet's cupboards.

A Conservative might well give Alexander a pat on the back for his clever tax avoidance, but Laws? Knowing the public mood, Cameron must have realised that if it came to light it would destroy him - at least temporarily - and do irreparable damage to the reputation of the Lib Dems as the 'good guys'.

In Spain, we keep a jar of fish heads and tails to attract the wasps and flies away from where we're eating. It works rather well.

17 comments:

trousers said...

Thanks for this analysis, Stray. I've not felt the impetus to follow any of this particularly closely, so this is good and informative stuff.

DJ Kirkby said...

I almost stopped reading when I saw this post was about politics but I'm glad I didn't as it was actually interesting. I never thought I'd say that about a post of this nature...

tpe said...

Outstanding, Stray.

No, please - Out. Standing.

A beautifully concise summation of a thoroughly wicked and deeply, deeply depressing affair. Thank you. I just feel sick and helpless in the face of these people. They lack honour. They simply lack honour. The greed and cunning disgusts me.

Kind regards etc...

TPE

(Hello and many man-hugs to Trousers)

文辰 said...

we‘re so proud of you!............................................................

trousers said...

Duly reciprocated - in the most appropriately manly way - TPE, and good to see you sir.

正玲正玲 said...

很用心的blog,推推哦 ..................................................

tpe said...

Ah, Trousers, bless you, lovely to collide again. Instead of rambling at you in this space, I'll come over and do so in your own blog home. (I'm moving at a glacial speed, however, trying to catch up with everyone, so expect moderate to severe delays.)

Stray, sorry, hello again. I also wanted to say (should have said it at the time, I know) that I felt a similar sort of relief when I read this post of yours a wee while back. At last, I thought, somebody gets it.

Kind regards etc...

TPE

佩GailBohanan1蓉 said...

Make yourself necessary to someone.............................................................

黃佳伸 said...

失去金錢的人,失去很多;失去朋友的人,失去更多;失去信心的人,失去所有。..................................................................

林奕廷 said...

hello, i visited~~感謝大大分享..!......................................................................

邦雄 said...

河水永遠是相同的,可是每一剎那又都是新的。.................................................................

冠宏 said...

Quality is better than quantity.....................................................................

貴寶 said...

人有兩眼一舌,是為了觀察倍於說話的緣故。............................................................

天花天花 said...

走過路過~不能錯過~哈哈............................................................

育隆 said...

Quietude is the crown of life.............................................................

江冠彭珮李佳宏陽筠 said...

晚上好,很喜歡你的blog哦...............................................................

郁雯郁雯 said...

HELLO~幫你推個文^^..................................................................